Like most things we undertake, there are always the unexpected glitches to be overcome. I first had to find the full text of that interview, conducted 15 years earlier. Thanks to a pack rat tendency to preserve such things, and the power of Macintosh's "Spotlight" search tool, I found that old file. However, it was a file that had been written, originally, in Wordstar, or some other, equally archaic, word processing software. After all, in those days, I was still using CP/M-driven computers, and the wonders of Lotus, AmiPro 3, WordPerfect, and (shudder!) MS Word, were still in the future. So the 11-page (single-spaced) document was filled with partial words, because translation into
later word processors over the years had dropped end characters and, occasionally, small words from the document.
Surprisingly, examination of the text proved that the assertions about people being able to read jumbled and fragmented text are essentially correct, but it was a labor-intensive, word-by-word process and, frustratingly, some phrases were not comprehensible. Then, I thought, "Wait a minute--what if I still have the original recording of that interview?" Another intensive search revealed that I had kept it--in my library of "Ancient--Frequently Useless-Recordings."
The full text of that interview is contained below. Please note that it is laid out as follows: the letter, "J," in front of text indicates that it is Jeremy Brett's response; the letter, "K," indicates a question or comment by "Kevin" (that's me, folks). Three other people appear, briefly, in the interview.
Diane Srebro, represented Jeremy Brett's host, Public Television Station WTTW, and her full name is used in front of her comments. A newspaper photographer, whom I had arranged to have photograph Jeremy, to support the article that I planned to write, is represented by the letter, "R." My wife, Joann, was the third person. To avoid confusion with Jeremy, I use, "Joann," instead of merely her first initial.
Please note, too, that in one or two places I could not clarify what Jeremy said, despite seemingly endless (in one instance) replaying of the segment. In such cases, I've indicated parenthetically that it wasn't possible to clarify that part.
If you'd like to know what that experience was like, fifteen years ago, I can only say now that I believe that both Joann and I were probably "high" for a couple of weeks afterward--and, of course, every time we view an episode of Sherlock Holmes, we again mourn his passing so prematurely, while delighting in the memory of our brief contact with Jeremy Brett.
later word processors over the years had dropped end characters and, occasionally, small words from the document.
Surprisingly, examination of the text proved that the assertions about people being able to read jumbled and fragmented text are essentially correct, but it was a labor-intensive, word-by-word process and, frustratingly, some phrases were not comprehensible. Then, I thought, "Wait a minute--what if I still have the original recording of that interview?" Another intensive search revealed that I had kept it--in my library of "Ancient--Frequently Useless-Recordings."
The full text of that interview is contained below. Please note that it is laid out as follows: the letter, "J," in front of text indicates that it is Jeremy Brett's response; the letter, "K," indicates a question or comment by "Kevin" (that's me, folks). Three other people appear, briefly, in the interview.
Diane Srebro, represented Jeremy Brett's host, Public Television Station WTTW, and her full name is used in front of her comments. A newspaper photographer, whom I had arranged to have photograph Jeremy, to support the article that I planned to write, is represented by the letter, "R." My wife, Joann, was the third person. To avoid confusion with Jeremy, I use, "Joann," instead of merely her first initial.
Please note, too, that in one or two places I could not clarify what Jeremy said, despite seemingly endless (in one instance) replaying of the segment. In such cases, I've indicated parenthetically that it wasn't possible to clarify that part.
If you'd like to know what that experience was like, fifteen years ago, I can only say now that I believe that both Joann and I were probably "high" for a couple of weeks afterward--and, of course, every time we view an episode of Sherlock Holmes, we again mourn his passing so prematurely, while delighting in the memory of our brief contact with Jeremy Brett.