一生一世爱小拉吧 关注:75贴子:2,523

回复:【人因】了解人因 学习人因

取消只看楼主收藏回复

HF&E continues to be successfully applied in the fields of aerospace, aging, health care, IT, product design, transportation, training, nuclear and virtual environments, among others. Physical ergonomics is important in the medical field, particularly to those diagnosed with physiological ailments or disorders such as arthritis (both chronic and temporary) or carpal tunnel syndrome. Pressure that is insignificant or imperceptible to those unaffected by these disorders may be very painful, or render a device unusable, for those who are. Many ergonomically designed products are also used or recommended to treat or prevent such disorders, and to treat pressure-related chronic pain.[citation needed]
One of the most prevalent types of work-related injuries are musculoskeletal disorders. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMDs) result in persistent pain, loss of functional capacity and work disability, but their initial diagnosis is difficult because they are mainly based on complaints of pain and other symptoms.[11] Every year 1.8 million U.S. workers experience WRMDs and nearly 600,000 of the injuries are serious enough to cause workers to miss work.[12]Certain jobs or work conditions cause a higher rate worker complaints of undue strain, localized fatigue, discomfort, or pain that does not go away after overnight rest. These types of jobs are often those involving activities such as repetitive and forceful exertions; frequent, heavy, or overhead lifts; awkward work positions; or use of vibrating equipment.[13] The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has found substantial evidence that ergonomics programs can cut workers' compensation costs, increase productivity and decrease employee turnover.[14] Therefore, it is important to gather data to identify jobs or work conditions that are most problematic, using sources such as injury and illness logs, medical records, and job analyses.[13]
The emerging field of human factors in highway safety uses human factor principles to understand the actions and capabilities of road users - car and truck drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, etc. - and use this knowledge to design roads and streets to reduce traffic collisions. Driver error is listed as a contributing factor in 44% of fatal collisions in the United States, so a topic of particular interest is how road users gather and process information about the road and its environment, and how to assist them to make the appropriate decision. [15][edit]Practitioners
Human factors practitioners come from a variety of backgrounds, though predominantly they are psychologists (from the various subfields of engineering psychology, cognitive psychology, perceptual psychology, applied psychology, and experimental psychology) and physiologists. Designers (industrial, interaction, and graphic), anthropologists, technical communication scholars and computer scientists also contribute. Typically, an ergonomist will have an undergraduate degree in psychology, engineering, design or health sciences, and usually a masters degree or doctoral degree in a related discipline. Though some practitioners enter the field of human factors from other disciplines, both M.S. and PhD degrees in Human Factors Engineering are available from several universities worldwide. The Human Factors Research Group (HFRG) at the University of Nottingham provides human factors courses at both at MSc and PhD level including a distance learning course in Applied Ergonomics.[16] Other Universities to offer postgraduate courses in human factors in the UK include Loughborough University,Cranfield University and the University of Oxford.[citation needed][edit]Methods
I


18楼2013-03-02 21:07
回复
    Until recently, methods used to evaluate human factors and ergonomics ranged from simple questionnaires to more complex and expensive usability labs.[17] Some of the more common HF&E methods are listed below:
    Ethnographic analysis: Using methods derived from ethnography, this process focuses on observing the uses of technology in a practical environment. It is a qualitative and observational method that focuses on "real-world" experience and pressures, and the usage of technology or environments in the workplace. The process is best used early in the design process.[18]
    Focus Groups are another form of qualitative research in which one individual will facilitate discussion and elicit opinions about the technology or process under investigation. This can be on a one to one interview basis, or in a group session. Can be used to gain a large quantity of deep qualitative data,[19]though due to the small sample size, can be subject to a higher degree of individual bias.[20] Can be used at any point in the design process, as it is largely dependent on the exact questions to be pursued, and the structure of the group. Can be extremely costly.
    Iterative design: Also known as prototyping, the iterative design process seeks to involve users at several stages of design, in order to correct problems as they emerge. As prototypes emerge from the design process, these are subjected to other forms of analysis as outlined in this article, and the results are then taken and incorporated into the new design. Trends amongst users are analyzed, and products redesigned. This can become a costly process, and needs to be done as soon as possible in the design process before designs become too concrete.[18]
    Meta-analysis: A supplementary technique used to examine a wide body of already existing data or literature in order to derive trends or form hypotheses in order to aid design decisions. As part of a literature survey, a meta-analysis can be performed in order to discern a collective trend from individual variables.[20]


    19楼2013-03-02 21:07
    回复
      Methods Analysis is the process of studying the tasks a worker completes using a step-by-step investigation. Each task in broken down into smaller steps until each motion the worker performs is described. Doing so enables you to see exactly where repetitive or straining tasks occur.
      Time studies determine the time required for a worker to complete each task. Time studies are often used to analyze cyclical jobs. They are considered “event based” studies because time measurements are triggered by the occurrence of predetermined events.[22]
      Work sampling is a method in which the job is sampled at random intervals to determine the proportion of total time spent on a particular task.[22] It provides insight into how often workers are performing tasks which might cause strain on their bodies.
      Predetermined time systems are methods for analyzing the time spent by workers on a particular task. One of the most widely used predetermined time system is called Methods-Time-Measurement (MTM). Other common work measurement systems include MODAPTS and MOST.[citation needed]
      Cognitive Walkthrough: This method is a usability inspection method in which the evaluators can apply user perspective to task scenarios to identify design problems. As applied to macroergonomics, evaluators are able to analyze the usability of work system designs to identify how well a work system is organized and how well the workflow is integrated.[23]
      Kansei Method: This is a method that transforms consumer’s responses to new products into design specifications. As applied to macroergonomics, this method can translate employee’s responses to changes to a work system into design specifications.[23]
      High Integration of Technology, Organization, and People (HITOP): This is a manual procedure done step-by-step to apply technological change to the workplace. It allows managers to be more aware of the human and organizational aspects of their technology plans, allowing them to efficiently integrate technology in these contexts.[23]
      Top Modeler: This model helps manufacturing companies identify the organizational changes needed when new technologies are being considered for their process.[23]
      Computer-integrated Manufacturing, Organization, and People System Design (CIMOP): This model allows for evaluating computer-integrated manufacturing, organization, and people system design based on knowledge of the system.[23]
      Anthropotechnology: This method considers analysis and design modification of systems for the efficient transfer of technology from one culture to another.[23]
      Systems Analysis Tool (SAT): This is a method to conduct systematic trade-off evaluations of work-system intervention alternatives.[23]
      Macroergonomic Analysis of Structure (MAS): This method analyzes the structure of work systems according to their compatibility with unique sociotechnical aspects.[23]
      Macroergonomic Analysis and Design (MEAD): This method assesses work-system processes by using a ten-step process.[23]
      I


      20楼2013-03-02 21:21
      回复

        Virtual Manufacturing and Response Surface Methodology (VMRSM): This method uses computerized tools and statistical analysis for workstation design.[24][edit]Weaknesses of HF&E methods
        Problems in how usability measures are employed include the fact that measures of learning and retention of how to use an interface are rarely employed during methods and some studies treat measures of how users interact with interfaces as synonymous with quality-in-use, despite an unclear relation.[25]
        Although field methods can be extremely useful because they are conducted in the users natural environment, they have some major limitations to consider. The limitations include:
        Usually take more time and resources than other methods
        Very high effort in planning, recruiting, and executing than other methods
        Much longer study periods and therefore requires much goodwill among the participants
        Studies are longitudinal in nature, therefore, attrition can become a problem.[26][edit]See alsoMain article: Outline of ergonomics Design portal
        Related subjects
        Anthropometrics
        Back injury
        Carpal tunnel syndrome
        Cognitive ergonomics
        Cognitive load
        Human-computer interaction
        Human-in-the-Loop
        Human reliability
        Industrial noise
        Latent human error
        Manual handling
        Mockup
        Musculoskeletal disorder
        Needs analysis
        Repetitive strain injury
        Rohmert's law
        System Usability Scale
        Related fields
        Activity-centered ergonomics
        Crew Resource Management
        Design for All
        Engineering psychology
        Environmental design
        Experience design
        High velocity human factors
        Human computer interaction
        Human-centered computing (discipline)
        Human factors integration
        Industrial Design
        Industrial engineering
        Industrial hygiene
        Light ergonomics
        Maintenance Resource Management
        Occupational health psychology
        Occupational therapy
        Participatory Ergonomics
        Safety engineering
        Single pilot resource management


        21楼2013-03-02 21:21
        回复

          Fifteen to 30 years
          ago, the focus of most ergonomics programs was on MSD injuries, and the
          approach was reactive. Early programs used symptoms and injuries as a measure
          of problem and success, used qualitative tools, and tended to react to injuries
          and employee complaints.
          Today, leading
          companies are proactive. They use quantitative tools to measure exposure to MSD
          risk factors and then focus their efforts on changing the job conditions to
          reduce the level of exposure—before an injury occurs. This shift is
          significant; as established ergonomics programs mature, they become more
          efficient and effective.


          22楼2013-03-02 22:12
          回复
            23楼2013-03-02 23:18
            回复
              24楼2013-03-02 23:19
              回复
                25楼2013-03-02 23:20
                回复
                  哥大的人因设立在一个奇怪的部门http://ehs.columbia.edu/index.html


                  26楼2013-03-02 23:21
                  回复
                    http://www.healthywork.org.uk/


                    27楼2013-03-02 23:22
                    回复
                      http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg90.pdf


                      28楼2013-03-02 23:22
                      回复
                        29楼2013-03-02 23:25
                        回复
                          30楼2013-03-03 00:14
                          回复
                            31楼2013-03-03 00:15
                            回复
                              32楼2013-03-03 00:15
                              回复