李越阡吧 关注:13贴子:514
  • 2回复贴,共1

How John Maynard Keynes defines economists

只看楼主收藏回复

"The study of economics does not seem to require any specialized gifts of an unusually high order.Is it not... a very easy subject compared with the higher branches of philosophy or pure science?An easy subject,at which very few excel!The paradox finds its explanation ,perhaps,in that the master-econimist must possess a rare combination of gifts.He must be mathematician,historian,statesman,philosopher----in some degree.He must understand symbols and speak in words.He must contemplate the particular in terms of the general,and touch abstract and concrete in the same flight of thought.He must study the present in the light of the past for the purposes of the future.No part of man's nature or his institutions must lie entirely outside his regard.He must be purposeful and disinterested in a simultaneous mood;as aloof and incorruptible as an artist,yet sometimes as near the earth as a politician."
唉 好晚了,明天再打翻译上来



IP属地:新加坡1楼2010-06-23 05:23回复
    经济学研究似乎不需要任何极高的特殊天赋。与更高深的哲学和纯科学相比,经济学不是……一门极其容易的学科吗?它是一门容易的学科,但这个学科中很少有人能出类拔萃!这个悖论的解释也许在于杰出的经济学家应该同时具有各种罕见的天赋。在某种程度上,他应该是数学家、历史学家、政治家、和哲学家。他必须了解符号并用文字将其表达出来。他必须根据一般性来深入思考特殊性,并在思绪奔放的同时触及抽象与具体。他必须根据过去、着眼未来而研究现在。他必须坚持考虑到人性或人的制度的每一部分。他必须同时保持坚定而客观的情绪,要像艺术家一样超然而不流俗,但有时候又要像政客一样脚踏实地。
    


    IP属地:新加坡2楼2010-07-05 00:05
    回复
      2025-05-30 02:26:09
      广告
      nice


      3楼2012-01-14 15:51
      回复