嗯。

Different stances would inevitably lead to different approaches to the same problem.

As far as I am concerned, PVZ bar has nothing to do with me; all I care about is the game itself.

The history of this game is all about defensing the indefensible and making the unworkable work.

As for the 'culture components', be it the aesthetics of a build, the hard work of practicing gameplay, the fineness of details, or even the philosophy of endless builds, they are no more than a culture for entertainment.

It's perfectly fine to pursue such a culture, but if it makes very little contribution to the development of technology, it is best to be avoided.

Otherwise, it would most likely culminate in some laughable sentiments of self-pity.

The technology circles, from my point of view, should be dedicated to the exploration and exploitation of gaming techniques. Human beings are complicated, but human beings on the Internet could be incomplete and thereof simple. It is hence possible to extract an abstract sense of collectivist will as the base of technology circles.

In my ideal, everyone should regard the development of technology as their primary duty, and always assess the value of findings on the basis of logical, impersonal judgement. I wouldn't pessimistically hope that PVZers several years from now will admire our antiquated 'culture' which would have lost its depths. Rather, my hope is that the technology circles, along with the PVZers who are passionate for exploring the potential of this great game, would become an organic collection and last long, even forever.

As for last, I'd like to present this indicies. It's not complete yet; I got stuck on one or two of the concepts. If I ever finishes writing it one day, the skyscraper of technology will then be built purely on the basis of logic, instead of some encyclopedia or glossory, alas.

暂时先翻到这里。
翻译基本没啥难度，只是需要一点英文水平而已= =b

Four years have passed. There haven't been many impressive non-cannons in your bar.

无法理解bd的经验机制。