念念不忘，必有回响
（1）
You had me atHello.
朴炯植从未能够如此清楚地忆起一句电影台词。
可当朴宝英从人群中走向他时，《Jerry Maguire》中被无数人誉为爱情电影经典的对白就在那一瞬间涌入他的脑海，占据了所有思绪，以至于问好时都险些叫错称呼。
即便是早前已经因为拍摄画报短暂地相处了一段时间，在剧本研读会上再一次见到朴宝英时，朴炯植仍是有些恍惚。
除去对自己即将担任电视剧男一号的惊喜和担心，更多的是对于能与她共同出演的期待与不可置信。
一开始是经纪人从朋友那里得知有部新剧邀请了朴宝英出演女主角，当作饭后谈资告诉了他。从那时起，他的心就不时失速地跳动，总觉得将有什么事会发生。
让经纪人多去了解一些，果真几天后就拿到了剧本。草草翻了几页，朴炯植的目光锁定在女一号一栏上，望着“朴宝英”三个字眯了眯眼。
“哥，拜托了，一定要争取到这部戏的男一号。一定。”
或者是真的与角色太过相像，又或者是导演认可了他的努力与演技，朴炯植最后得到了这个机会。
坐在研讨会的现场，看着剧本上自己与她的名字并排在一起，并分别冠上男一号与女一号的前缀，朴炯植越看越觉得说不出的顺眼。
那年的墨尔本，好像也是现在这样的天气。
熹微晨光天空渐由晦暗泛起鱼肚白如油彩，蔚蓝天空时而划过机尾徒留浅色烟雾，芃芃草木清香散入空气中萦绕鼻尖，梧桐树扎根路边发挥着寂寥独秀。
虽知不一定有必要，朴炯植还是戴上了眼镜和口罩，未雨绸缪总是没什么坏处。漫步在清晨的墨尔本街道，身边有西装革履的上班族匆匆而过，耳机里的轻音乐缓缓流淌着，整个人都是说不出的惬意与悠闲。
坐在州立图书馆门前的台阶上，有阳光暖暖地照耀，似乎内心里所有的烦扰与阴暗，都在这些光芒下渐渐消融不见，让他愈发觉得这次休假是个再正确不过的决定。
这个晚上总是聚集了众多留学生街头表演的圣地，白天时便是野餐与读书的不二之选。看着人们三三两两地在身边坐下，渐渐将这不大的地方填满，朴炯植漫无目的逡巡的视线忽然在不远的一处停下。那里坐着个女孩，亚洲人的面容，戴了顶帽子，长发撩起后露出的侧脸看上去有些熟悉，像极了近来将整个韩国刷屏的那部电影的女主角。为了电视剧拍摄正恶补近年各种剧集的朴炯植自然也不会错过，精湛的演技与引人入胜的剧情让他忍不住看了一遍又一遍，除去宋仲基令人震撼的表演，其实另一位单纯而有人情味的主人公更得他的心意。
反反复复将电影看了数遍，他几乎将那个女生的样貌复刻在了心底。而此刻眼前的人侧面的剪影，与记忆里的样子，完全重合在了一起。
朴宝英。
他在心底默念她的名字。
目光不由自主地聚集，总是装作不经意地望那个方向。看她与朋友相谈甚欢，风吹起她的长发时，能够窥见她的笑容，开朗而又温柔。可不知怎么的，他却能够看得出，她其实并不如表面那样高兴。她的笑容总是很快就收敛，笑意极少到达眼底，就算有，也会在一瞬之间消逝。
说不上是什么感觉，即便只是第一次见，看到朴宝英有些压抑的样子，朴炯植心里也有些闷闷的。忽然就很想知道是什么让她露出这样的表情，好奇心作祟，在朴宝英离开时，他也鬼使神差般地跟了上去。
沿着闹市区的石板路走着，或许是连续的上坡让她有些吃力，前进的速度并不快，朴炯植也就缓缓地跟在她身后。周围人声嘈杂，来来往往，他们却完全不受影响，只是一前一后，静静地走着。
墨尔本的韩裔留学生极多，前面的女子就算戴了帽子，也因为这段时间的大势不时被路人认出，看她好脾气地给他们签名又拜托他们不要说出去的样子，可爱极了。朴炯植将口罩又往上拉了拉，遮住蔓延开来的笑意。
朴宝英走走停停，终于在到达湖边时不再前行，整个人倚在石头砌成的护栏上，眺望着远方。偶尔有白色的海鸥从眼前飞过，她也会像小孩一样挥舞着手想与它们接触。
朴炯植也跟着她随即放慢了脚步。
“大家好，我是饰演女主角都奉顺的朴宝英。”
望向正在自我介绍的女孩，长发披肩柔顺乖巧，明眸因笑意微微眯起，更显娇小面颊容色明艳。上天对她似乎太过偏爱，岁月几乎都未曾在她身上留下痕迹，几年分别，再见她仍是当初的样子。
心下忽的就释然，唇边勾起温柔笑意。
终于，能够与你搭档，就这样正大光明地，一点一点向你靠近。
朴宝英，我们来日方长。

In the past 100 years, television shows up inpeople’s life as one of the most important inventions. With the scientifictechnology develops, there are growing numbers of TV programs produced, andsome people spend most of the time watching TV. So here comes a question: Doestelevision destroy the communication between us and friends or family? Somepeople steadfastly agree with the answer yes. Conversely, some others areskeptical about their theory. On my personal level, I prefer the latter one asmy inclination. I don’t think that televison destroy the communication amongpeople. There are several reasons to support my opinion.
First of all, on my perspective, watchingtelevision is an activity that family can share. You can switch to a channelthat everyone can watch, families can talk about this program instead of focuson their own things. So that nobody will be ignored, and the atmosphere will beharmony. The problem of destroying the communication will not exist. Forexample, there is a TV program named Spring Festival Gala which is asignificant show for every Chinese. It’s a traditional activity that familywill sit together and watch this gala during it broadcast every year, we willchat with each other about every show of this gala. Families will laughtogether, comment together, and when the new year is coming we will countbackwards together. According to this, do you think watching TV destroy the conversationamong people?
Further more, as long as we think objectivelyand thoroughly, watching television not only does not destroy people’srelationship, but also promote the communication between us and friends orfamily. Nowadays there are plenty of TV series, watching them is a ideal way tokill time that many people love. When you find some series are attractive, youcan recommend them to friends or family. If they start watching, you candiscuss the plots or characters in the series with them. Instead of destroy thecommunication, it create more topics for you to talk about, which means yourcommunication become more enthusiastic.
To wrap up, from the above analysis, it iseasy to notice that my idea can be supported by variety of the arguments andexamples. Though I partly disagree with this statement for the reason that weare supposed to oversimplify this situation. Through my thinking, I stillbelieve that watching TV does not destroy the communication between us andfriends or family.

Growing up, we learn that we are supposedto do things from beginning to the end, believing that soft fire makes sweetmalt. However, with the society’s development, the beat of people’s lifebecomes faster and faster which makes somebody anxiety and prefer to working onseveral tasks at the same time so that they will not miss the due time. So isfocusing on one project till the end still an activity that we should learn andcherish? Absolutely. From my perspective, this kind of quality that doing onlyone thing through to the end can still serve us in our personal lives.
It is a way for people to improve theirpatience. Starting a new project after finishing an old one actually means thatyou have enough patience and perseverance. Working on one project for a longtime always boring and annoying, you will be anxiety or bad-tempered at the endand that probably leads you to give up finishing it. On another aspect, keepingcompleting the task proves that you are persevering enough to finish someharder work.
It is a way for people to complete the taskmore perfect according to it is easier to concentrate on one project ratherthan two or more projects. When you are working on one project, you only needto search for information of one concept and that can make you dig deeper intothe materials. So that you can finish your project at different aspects andmake it more comprehensive. On the other hand, if you working on many projectsat the same time which means you have to find out information of severaldifferent topics, that might makes you hasty and disorderly. Due to you have tofinish several things together, you may be distracted from all kinds ofinformation, and at last your final consequence will be simple and justsuperficial.
In conclusion, it is obvious to find outthat my statement that people should work on one project at a period of time isreasonable and convinced. In order to finish the project satisfied andefficiency, we are supposed to focus on only one thing instead of working onmany things together.