本次QA来自于斯拉瓦·马卡罗夫，RG说最近没QA是Storm的锅，和她无关。因为Storm近一个月都不说话。

"Changes like this would prevent people from trying to use AMX40s as scouts because "hey, it's a light tank."" There are people that do this?
- Sure you can use any tank as scout, the point is that scout tanks would get more rewards for scouting
问：当初你们说修改数据显示方式能放置玩家因为看到AMX40是轻坦，就把它当侦察车去用。真有人这么干嘛？
答：当然你可以用任何车去侦查，但问题在于侦查车去侦查能拿到更多奖励。

Could you please ask about low tier map rotation? :)
-We need to remove shitty maps, including low tier maps, Mittengard!
问：能帮忙问下低级房的地图循环问题吗？
答：我们需要移除一些较差的地图，包括有低级地图，比如密特朗。
Any chance there was some mention of a time table for all these coming changes?
-Some will be in May patch
问：对于说过的那些修改，有没有可能透露下时间？（译注：应该是说上次在塞浦路斯开会提到的修改。）
答：有些在5月发布。

"What if active Sixth Sense allowed you to see through concealment for a short time as well as the passive benefit?"
How about just removing 6th sense from the game?
-Never. Without it, the price of a single mistake would skyrocket.
问：原来说给灯泡技能一个主动效果，能短时间透过掩体观察战场，同时还有被动效果。那么干脆把灯泡移除掉又怎样呢？
答：绝不会移除的。没有这个，犯一次错就会直接GG。

About swedish tanks or romanian ?
-Yes for Swedish
问：将来要出的是瑞典坦克还是罗马尼亚坦克？
答：是瑞典坦克。
What is that cluster shell? Would it explode in the air and cover a big area with huge shrapnels?
-More of a high caliber HE shells, T92 for example. Cluster shells did not exist in WW2
问：集束弹是啥？是不是在空中炸开，用大量单片覆盖广大区域？
答：更像是大口径HE，比如T92那种。二战时其实没有集束弹。

And no MM improvement?!
-Yes there would be MM improvement. What kind of Improvement are you asking for?
问：不改进分房系统吗？
答：会改进的。你到底是问什么改进？
How about giving the existing equipments an extra benefit or somewhat different effect if equipped to particular class, just like the camo paint effect differ from each class..?
-Yes, definitely.
BTW camo does benefit smaller vehicles more.
问：现有配件装备在不同类型的车上时，有不同的额外效果，这个是怎样的？就像不同类型的车上迷彩涂装有不同效果那样？
答：是的，就是这样。另：迷彩涂装不会给更小的车更多好处。

A unique set or unique piece of equipments for each nations to make the characteristic of a nation more apparent is perhaps nice.. Like, an equip that is only applicable to German's that give more accuracy, an improved shell that give more rng into +40/-25 into Russian's, etc.. That'll make a nation too strong at an aspect? Well, that's the whole point of difference in playstyle, no..?
-Unique national equip? May be.
问：每一个国家都有独特的装置或配件，让各个国家的车更具特色，这或许会很不错。比如德国车有专用的加精度装备，而苏联配件能把随机浮动提高到+40/-25，等等。这会不会使其在某一方面过强？这会突出不同玩法的区别，或者是不？
答：每个国家独特的装备？或许吧。

"The buff to the machinegun turret on the T110E5 was unintended" ok, but its ok for is7 to have an inpenetrable turret?
-Yes. Because it was impenetrable at the time and E5 was never built. E5 at the moment is a much better tank than IS7.
问：你们说T110E5机枪塔的加强不是故意的。好吧，但给IS-7一个打不穿的炮塔就没问题？
答：是的。因为在IS-7的年代，它就是打不穿的。而E5就没造出来过，当时的E5比IS-7要好很多了。

WG admitted there was a problem with corridor maps... and then said they aren't going to change the maps but the tanks instead... :( why WG why?
-We will change maps, starting with removal of corridor ones.
问：WG承认走廊式地图有问题，但他们又说不准备改地图，而是改坦克。这是什么鬼？
答：我们会修改地图的，从移除走廊地图开始。

But, what about the Chieftain's implementation in the game?
-We need a new T10 Brit heavy, I hope Chieftain will do, but it seems that there was a problem with it’s armor- not as good as expected.
问：酋长酋长酋长
答：我们需要新的英系10级重坦。我希望能出酋长，但看来装甲方面有些问题，不是如预期那么好。

Nobody mentioned historical battles?
-No historical battles until we have PvE scripts+bots. Noone wanted to play historical low level tanks, everyone wanted to gib lowbie Pz3s with Su152s. With PvE bots, bots will play lowbie tanks and players get to gib them in top tanks.
问：就没人提历史战吗？
答：在我们搞定PvE脚本和AI之前不会有历史战。没有想用低级车玩历史战，他们都想用SU-152去虐三号。而有了PvE AI后，AI操控低级坦克，玩家可以用高级车来虐AI。