时间是制造出来的。
在不同的维度，时间制造的方式 不同。
我们的世界是根据世界产生和结束的周期来定一个时间框架。
时间存在这个世界内，世界外的情况要外边的构造定，可以不设世界，也就没有时间。
也就是说我们的世界是有边的。
他们之所以称没有时间，是因为他们不在我们这个世界内，我们这个世界的主要特点是引力大，，为了有足够的引力，，要把星球的质量提上去，这个质量是相对质量，，也就是太阳的质量要比地球的质量高很多，才能达到设计要求。
在另外的维度，他们故意不设高质量星球，没有了引力，可能是引力很低，不是没有，没有也麻烦。
低质量的星球的引力不起大的作用，那么所谓高纬度存有的灵魂，忆念就不受限制，那叫想什么来什么，心想事成。
那些外星人也说有寿命，说明那里也有时间，但计算方式不一定一样。
什么地方都不可能没有时间，，没有时间就意味着那个世界都不存在，，，世界不存在，，生灵在哪活动，，总要有个空间，不管那个空间构成的多么稀奇，本质上是一样的。
世界，世界，，先有界，再有世，，当然造物主级别的可以穿越，，但也要合规矩。
造物主，不能在一个没有的世界里造出时间，同理，时间没有了，世界也就不存在了，
可造物主要表现自己，必须造出世界，，在世界的方方面面体现自己的存在，，所以时间是造物主调控世界的主要手段，，而不是说目的是让时间没有了，，那样很自在，多么高级，多么高人一等，，让你去达到那个极端目的，，达到了没有时间又能怎么样？

这是站在 造物主的角度看，也就是看，他能进入一个具体的世界吗，连造物主都说我们只能在合一的状态下见到他，，也就是说他们不能现出实相。那些高灵比造物主强点，但要遵守不干预宇宙法则什么的，也不能现身，只能在外边yy。
所以说我们才是真正的神，我们可以决定世界的命运。我们不想干，他们一点辙都没有。
:顶多把我们收割了，重新播种。但在下边的体验仍然是我们自己的，当然也是造物主的，，一旦有一天，，下边的真的“觉悟”了，很有可能不按当初造物主设计的发展，这是必然的。谁让他们定这规矩，，什么规矩有什么结果。

Close Approach to Galactic Center of Cloud G2 around July 2013
靠近银河系中心的云G2 2013年7月各地

← High energy emissions from the Crab nebula do not coincide with pulsar Possible Arrival of a Galactic Superwave within the Coming Months? → Close Approach to Galactic Center of Cloud G2 around July 2013
Posted on October 20, 2012 by P. LaViolette
　　←高能源排放的蟹状星云不配合pulsarPossible到来的银河Superwave在未来几个月?→
　　靠近银河系中心的云G2 2013年7月各地
　　张贴在2012年10月20日,由LaViolette p

Universe Today story
Nature article
For a decade now astronomers have been tracking the progress of a dense gas cloud called G2 which now is rapidly approaching the Galactic center on a very eccentric elliptical orbit (eccentricity ~ 0.95) and is estimated to reach pericenter (the point of closest approach) around the beginning of July 2013. Tidal forces have already been observed to stretch the cloud and these forces will become increasingly strong over the next 9 months as the cloud approaches orbit pericenter at which point it is thought that they will be strong enough to completely rip the cloud apart. At this point the dispersed cloud is expected to be gravitationally drawn into the Galactic core with the consequent release of a large amount of energy in the form of cosmic rays and gamma ray emission.
宇宙今天故事
　　性质的文章
十年了现在天文学家们一直在跟踪进度,稠密气云称为G2目前正迅速接近银河系中心在一个非常偏心椭圆轨道(偏心~ 0.95)和估计达到近心点(最接近的点)在2013年7月的开始。潮汐力已经被观察到,这些力量伸展云将变得越来越强大在接下来的9个月为云方法轨道近心点此时人们认为他们将是强大到足以完全成熟的云分开。在这一点上,分散云将是重力吸引到银河核心与顺向释放大量的能量形式的宇宙射线和γ射线发射。

I do not deny the possibility that a superwave could arrive in the next years. I have long maintained that we are overdue for such an event and give a 95% probability that a superwave (large or small) should arrive sometime in the next 400 years. However, it is difficult to make predictions before hand. Now, with this cloud having been detected in advance, the question arises whether this near approach event could be what triggers the long overdue Galactic core outburst and accompanying superwave. Indeed, studies and observations of the Galactic center similar to these reporting on the G2 cloud could give us advance warning about the potential arrival date of an impending superwave catastrophe.
我不否认这种可能性,一个superwave可以到达第二年。我一直认为,我们早应该被这样一个事件,给95%的概率,superwave(大或者小)应该到达在未来400年的某个时候。然而,很难预测前手。现在,这个云被提前发现,问题出现了,这是否可能是附近的方法事件触发姗姗来迟银河核心突出、superwave陪同。事实上,研究和观察的银河中心类似于这些报告对G2的云可以给我们预先警告潜在的抵达日期即将来临的superwave灾难。

I have looked at literature that has been published about this cloud, have considered all aspects carefully, and have reached the conclusion that this encounter could very well initiate an energetic flare from the Galaxy’s core as astronomers predict, but that this will likely not be powerful enough to produce a superwave. That is, it will not be sufficiently energetic to launch a cosmic ray volley that could locally overpower the interstellar magnetic field and allow long-range flight of the cosmic rays out of our Galaxy’s nuclear bulge. Also, if it were able to release cosmic rays along rectilinear trajectories towards us and produce a superwave, I don’t believe that the consequences would pose any kind of health hazard. Although there is a rather remote possibility (which I cannot presently rule out) that such a superwave may be a Magnitude 1 superwave that carries an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) and geomagnetic disturbance similar to a Carrington solar flare event, one that would be able to disrupt our electrical grid and satellite communication systems. Also a magnitude 1 event could possibly cause significant seismic activity similar to the December 2004 tsunami event that struck two days before our satellites registered the largest Galactic gamma ray burst in modern history. But these more serious EMP and gravity wave consequences should occur only if the G2 cloud break up and consumption occurred quickly, as we will discuss below.

我已经看了看文献,发表关于这云,仔细考虑了所有方面,已经得出这样的结论:这遇到很可能启动一个精力充沛的火焰从星系核心,作为天文学家预测,但这不会强大到足以产生一个superwave。也就是说,它将不能保持足够的能量发射宇宙射线截击,可能局部过载星际磁场和允许远程飞行的宇宙射线从我们的星系核隆起。同样,如果它能够释放宇宙射线沿着直线轨迹,产生一个superwave向我们,我不相信的后果会造成任何健康危害。虽然有一个相当遥远的可能性(我目前无法排除),这样一个superwave可能superwave级1,携带一个电磁脉冲(EMP)和地磁扰动类似于卡灵顿的太阳耀斑事件,将能够破坏我们的电网和卫星通信系统。还一个级1事件可能导致重大的地震活动类似于2004年12月的海啸事件发生在两天前我们的卫星注册最大的星系的伽玛射线爆发在现代历史。但这些更严重的EMP和重力波的后果应该只发生如果G2云分手和消费发生的很快,我们将在下面讨论。

One question that comes to mind is whether the G2 cloud has been orbiting the GC for some time. Its orbit is observed to have a period of 138 ± 11 years and we see that no unusual cosmic or auroral effects took place on Earth back in 1875. However, it seems that astronomers have come to conclude that it is making its first pass toward the Galactic center and that this cloud somehow originated for the first time around 1944 in the vicinity of the ring of blue giant stars that orbits the Galactic center. So this may be the cloud’s first close encounter with the GC. Whether there have been similar close encounters in the past centuries or millennia is left to speculation. Our ability to track such objects in the vicinity of the GC came into play mainly in the past decade. This G2 cloud was first discovered in 2006.
一个问题想到的是是否云一直绕着G2 GC对于一些时间。它的轨道是观察到有一段138±11年,我们看到,没有不寻常的宇宙或极光效应发生在地球回到1875年。然而,似乎天文学家得出结论,它是将首次通过向银河系中心,这云不知何故起源于第一次约1944附近的蓝巨星的环围绕银河系中心。所以这可能是云的第一次亲密接触与GC。是否已经有类似的亲密接触在过去几百年或几千年留下的猜测。我们的能力来跟踪这些物体附近的GC来到玩主要是在过去的十年。这G2云在2006年首次被发现。

c) Suppose as an extreme that all of the 3 earth masses of this dispersed cloud were to crash onto the surface of the Galactic core within a period of one day. This would add a total of ~1049 ergs, or about the energy of a type I supernova explosion. If added to the core over a 1 day period this would amount to 1044 ergs/s, or to a 10 fold increase in the overall energy output of Sgr A* assuming it normally emits cosmic ray protons and electrons at the rate of 1043 ergs/s. The type 1a Tycho supernova, which was observed by Tycho Brahe in 1572 AD, involved a comparable release of energy and occurred at a distance three times closer than the Galactic center. While no harmful effects were observed to the Earth, the gamma ray burst from this explosion did cause an elevation in the ionization of the Earth’s atmosphere leaving a distinct nitrate ion peak in the Greenland ice record. A 2013 GC burst of this magnitude, but 10 fold weaker due to the greater distance, may also cause a noticeable elevation of atmospheric ionization. Whether this disturbance would be accompanied by an EMP that could adversely affect modern society is difficult to say — possibly, but probably unlikely.

One last comment, for many years I have been against the black hole concept. My long research on this subject has led me to believe that black hole singularities are unable to form in nature and in fact that the evidence is contrary to their existence. In particular we now know enough about our own galactic core that we can conclude that the core is not a black hole, but rather a supermassive dense star. This evidence has been discussed in another posting (http://starburstfound.org/sqkblog/?p=115). I share the opinion of MIT professor Phillip Morrison that black holes “only exist in the minds of physicists and astrophysicists”. As a result, as you may note above I have used the theoretically neutral phrase “galactic core” in referring to Sgr A*. Calculations which are presented in my bookSubquantum Kinetics (4th ed.) estimate that the core has a radius of ~0.1 AU. This happens to be very close to what standard physics proclaims is the black hole event horizon radius for Sgr A* which is 0.09 AU. So, the energy release calculations I have made above jive quite closely with what physicists estimate would be the energy released by matter falling through the event horizon of a black hole. The only difference is that in conventional black hole theory only a portion of this infalling matter would release energy that would be visible to the outside world. The rest, perhaps 90% would be irretreivably lost into the supposed black hole. But as I stated earlier, this whole black hole idea is an immense fiction.

One last comment, for many years I have been against the black hole concept. My long research on this subject has led me to believe that black hole singularities are unable to form in nature and in fact that the evidence is contrary to their existence. In particular we now know enough about our own galactic core that we can conclude that the core is not a black hole, but rather a supermassive dense star. This evidence has been discussed in another posting ( I share the opinion of MIT professor Phillip Morrison that black holes “only exist in the minds of physicists and astrophysicists”. As a result, as you may note above I have used the theoretically neutral phrase “galactic core” in referring to Sgr A*. Calculations which are presented in my bookSubquantum Kinetics (4th ed.) estimate that the core has a radius of ~0.1 AU. This happens to be very close to what standard physics proclaims is the black hole event horizon radius for Sgr A* which is 0.09 AU. So, the energy release calculations I have made above jive quite closely with what physicists estimate would be the energy released by matter falling through the event horizon of a black hole. The only difference is that in conventional black hole theory only a portion of this infalling matter would release energy that would be visible to the outside world. The rest, perhaps 90% would be irretreivably lost into the supposed black hole. But as I stated earlier, this whole black hole idea is an immense fiction.

最后一个评论,多年来我一直对黑洞的概念。我研究这个课题的长促使我相信黑洞奇点无法形式在自然和事实相反的证据是存在的。特别是现在我们知道足够的关于我们自己的星系的核心,我们可以得出结论,核心不是一个黑洞,而是一个超大质量恒星密集。这证据已经讨论了在另一个帖子
我分享的看法,麻省理工学院教授菲利普·莫里森,黑洞”只存在于物理学家和天体物理学家的头脑”。因此,正如你可能注意上面我用理论上的中性短语“银河核心”在谈到Sgr a *。提出了计算,它在我的书Subquantum动力学(第四版)。估计核心半径~ 0.1 AU。这是非常接近标准物理宣称是黑洞事件视界半径对Sgr A * 0.09 AU。因此,能量释放的计算我有上面做隐语相当密切与物理学家们估计会释放的能量由物质掉进一个黑洞的视界。唯一的区别是,在传统的黑洞理论只有一部分这掉进物质会释放能量,看见外面的世界。其余的,也许90%会irretreivably失去了进入所谓的黑洞。但如前所述,这整个黑洞的想法是一个巨大的小说。

Also those who have read Subquantum Kinetics will know that one of the arguments I cite against black holes being the power houses for active galactic cores is that the energy outpouring from such cores is so great that it pushes gas and dust far from the core. In fact, in many cases such active cores are seen to have swept their immediate vicinity clean of gas and dust. So this has left astronomers in the embarrassing position of not being able to easily explain how a black hole would be producing such prodigious energy outputs without any matter falling into them. Even if a massive blue giant star were to approach such a core and become tidally ripped to pieces, the wind would be so strong that this matter would be blown far from the core. None would reach its surface. So one is left to conclude that active cores are powered by their own source of energy generated spontaneously within them, what I call genic energy.
的人也读Subquantum动力学将知道我引用的一个参数对黑洞的力量对活动星系核的房屋,能量源源不断从这样的核心是如此之大,以至于把气体和尘埃远离核心。事实上,在许多情况下这种活跃的核心被看作具有横扫他们紧邻清洁的气体和尘埃。所以这使得天文学家们陷入了尴尬境地——不能够轻易地解释一个黑洞会产生这种巨大的能量输出没有任何物质落入他们。即使一个巨大的蓝巨星都接近这样一个核心和潮撕得粉碎,风会这么强,这事会吹远离核心。没有人能达到它的表面。所以一个是左认为活跃的核心是靠他们自己的能量源的内部自然形成,我称之为基因的能源。