简闲吧 关注：49贴子：4,428
#2 paintgun
nationalism, patriotism and loyalty to the party
these are the pillars PLA can fall back to define this 'warrior ethos'
usually such thing evolve and stem from culture, like mentioned in the C-SPAN about duty and honor, but Chinese culture is currently in a limbo, and it has never emphasized much on warrior or war, in fact an averse subject, the core of chinese culture has always been family
民族主义、爱国主义和对党的忠诚，这些是解放军赖以形成尚武精神的支柱。这些东西植根于文化中并逐步演进，正如C-SPAN里（指一楼的视频）提到的责任和荣誉。但是中国文化现在固步自封，不再强调武力和战争，事实上正相反，中国文化的核心一直是家族。
nationalism, patriotism and loyalty to the party
these are the pillars PLA can fall back to define this 'warrior ethos'
usually such thing evolve and stem from culture, like mentioned in the C-SPAN about duty and honor, but Chinese culture is currently in a limbo, and it has never emphasized much on warrior or war, in fact an averse subject, the core of chinese culture has always been family
民族主义、爱国主义和对党的忠诚，这些是解放军赖以形成尚武精神的支柱。这些东西植根于文化中并逐步演进，正如C-SPAN里（指一楼的视频）提到的责任和荣誉。但是中国文化现在固步自封，不再强调武力和战争，事实上正相反，中国文化的核心一直是家族。
#3 delft
It is remarkable how different the conduct of military with a similar background can be. During the liberation of the Netherlands in 1944-45 the Poles and Canadians had the reputation of waging their lives to reconnoiter places that might still be occupied by the German army and try to spare the lives and property of the people living there, while the US army had the reputation of pouting artillery fire into anything suspicious without such concerns.
In the next war the Netherlands was concerned with, the war against newly independent Indonesia, war crimes were committed that could not be acknowledged until a short while ago. There were complaints at the time, in the mid-fifties a cousin of my mother's said this unit had taken part in terrible things he didn't want to talk about, in 1969 someone wrote a book about those war crimes that led to a temporally loud discussion that died down pretty soon but only this year the Dutch government lost a court case in The Hague that forced them to pay compensation to survivors of a massacre on Java in 1949. In the late '90's a short article in my newspaper by a veteran from that war described how he was send out as an officer with a small detachment to retrieve the administration of a forestry company on Sumatra. He took prisoner a small number of members of the Indonesian army but because he had too few men to guard them he had them shot. Quite clearly he didn't recognize that he was a war criminal and the newspaper didn't notice it either.
So this presentation by Mr. Pressfield compares "the" US military ethics with those of antique Greeks and with the Japanese army of WWI and WWII, and wonders about those strange beings in South Asia with but little comprehension of the differences between Western armies at a given time and as they developed through time. It was altogether a rather shallow presentation, although not as shallow as paintgun's remarks.
在相似的战争背景下，军队行为准则的差异可能是显著的。在1944年到1945年的荷兰解放战争中，波兰人和加拿大人愿意不惜性命去侦察德占区并尽力保全当地民众和财产，而美军则不管这么多，他们会向任何可疑物体投掷炮火。
在涉及荷兰的另一场战争，即反印尼独立战争中，存在战争犯罪，但一直到最近才被承认。当时就存在谴责之声，上世纪50年代，我母亲的一位表亲说军队干的一些龌龊事连他也不愿意提起。1969年有人写了一本关于那些战争犯罪的书并引发了一场大讨论，然而很快便消弭于无声。直到今年荷兰政府在海牙法庭的一场官司中败诉，并被判向1949年爪哇大屠杀的幸存者支付赔偿金。上世纪90年代末，一位老兵的一篇短文刊登在我的报纸上，文章描述他作为一个军官如何带领一支小分队收回苏门答腊岛的一家林业公司的管理权。他俘虏过一些印尼士兵，但是因为没有足够看守兵力，他射杀了那些俘虏。很显然，他并未意识到他是一个战犯，报纸同样也没有意识到这一点。
普莱斯菲尔德先生的演讲比较了美军、古希腊人和一战二战日军的军队行为准则，对奇怪的南亚人感到疑惑，但对同一时期西方军队之间的差异和发展缺乏了解。总体来说，这是一个十分肤浅的演讲，虽然比paintgun（2楼的那位仁兄）的言论稍好一些。
It is remarkable how different the conduct of military with a similar background can be. During the liberation of the Netherlands in 1944-45 the Poles and Canadians had the reputation of waging their lives to reconnoiter places that might still be occupied by the German army and try to spare the lives and property of the people living there, while the US army had the reputation of pouting artillery fire into anything suspicious without such concerns.
In the next war the Netherlands was concerned with, the war against newly independent Indonesia, war crimes were committed that could not be acknowledged until a short while ago. There were complaints at the time, in the mid-fifties a cousin of my mother's said this unit had taken part in terrible things he didn't want to talk about, in 1969 someone wrote a book about those war crimes that led to a temporally loud discussion that died down pretty soon but only this year the Dutch government lost a court case in The Hague that forced them to pay compensation to survivors of a massacre on Java in 1949. In the late '90's a short article in my newspaper by a veteran from that war described how he was send out as an officer with a small detachment to retrieve the administration of a forestry company on Sumatra. He took prisoner a small number of members of the Indonesian army but because he had too few men to guard them he had them shot. Quite clearly he didn't recognize that he was a war criminal and the newspaper didn't notice it either.
So this presentation by Mr. Pressfield compares "the" US military ethics with those of antique Greeks and with the Japanese army of WWI and WWII, and wonders about those strange beings in South Asia with but little comprehension of the differences between Western armies at a given time and as they developed through time. It was altogether a rather shallow presentation, although not as shallow as paintgun's remarks.
在相似的战争背景下，军队行为准则的差异可能是显著的。在1944年到1945年的荷兰解放战争中，波兰人和加拿大人愿意不惜性命去侦察德占区并尽力保全当地民众和财产，而美军则不管这么多，他们会向任何可疑物体投掷炮火。
在涉及荷兰的另一场战争，即反印尼独立战争中，存在战争犯罪，但一直到最近才被承认。当时就存在谴责之声，上世纪50年代，我母亲的一位表亲说军队干的一些龌龊事连他也不愿意提起。1969年有人写了一本关于那些战争犯罪的书并引发了一场大讨论，然而很快便消弭于无声。直到今年荷兰政府在海牙法庭的一场官司中败诉，并被判向1949年爪哇大屠杀的幸存者支付赔偿金。上世纪90年代末，一位老兵的一篇短文刊登在我的报纸上，文章描述他作为一个军官如何带领一支小分队收回苏门答腊岛的一家林业公司的管理权。他俘虏过一些印尼士兵，但是因为没有足够看守兵力，他射杀了那些俘虏。很显然，他并未意识到他是一个战犯，报纸同样也没有意识到这一点。
普莱斯菲尔德先生的演讲比较了美军、古希腊人和一战二战日军的军队行为准则，对奇怪的南亚人感到疑惑，但对同一时期西方军队之间的差异和发展缺乏了解。总体来说，这是一个十分肤浅的演讲，虽然比paintgun（2楼的那位仁兄）的言论稍好一些。
#4 paintgun
hey i knew someone was gonna shoot at me i almost put a final sentence : just a ramble don't shoot, and it did happen lol
cmon delft, ABC78 was asking about what is the defining values of modern Chinese 'warrior ethos' in PLA
let us be honest, noone is a saint in war and as they say as well, all is fair in love and war, what we are really looking into is what motivates and becomes the basis for such warrior ethos, the C-SPAN video is certainly speaking from American perspective, and remember he is speaking in front of an audience of military professionals to promote his work
now try answering ABC78's good question about this interesting topic without trying to put anyone down
嘿，我知道有人想要揍我，让我先说完最后一句话：大家就是随便逛逛，别激动lol
拜托，Delft（3楼），ABC78（楼主）问的是现代中国解放军中的尚武精神的确切核心价值是什么。
我们都诚实点看问题吧，没有人能在战争中做圣人，所有人在爱和战争中都是一样的。我们所能判断的是这种尚武精神的动机和基础是什么。那个C-SPAN的视频（指主楼的那个视频）确实是从美军的角度，但是请记住他为了促进自己的研究，正面对着一众军事专家进行演讲。
现在回答ABC78提出的关于这个有趣话题的问题，而不要试图打压别人。
hey i knew someone was gonna shoot at me i almost put a final sentence : just a ramble don't shoot, and it did happen lol
cmon delft, ABC78 was asking about what is the defining values of modern Chinese 'warrior ethos' in PLA
let us be honest, noone is a saint in war and as they say as well, all is fair in love and war, what we are really looking into is what motivates and becomes the basis for such warrior ethos, the C-SPAN video is certainly speaking from American perspective, and remember he is speaking in front of an audience of military professionals to promote his work
now try answering ABC78's good question about this interesting topic without trying to put anyone down
嘿，我知道有人想要揍我，让我先说完最后一句话：大家就是随便逛逛，别激动lol
拜托，Delft（3楼），ABC78（楼主）问的是现代中国解放军中的尚武精神的确切核心价值是什么。
我们都诚实点看问题吧，没有人能在战争中做圣人，所有人在爱和战争中都是一样的。我们所能判断的是这种尚武精神的动机和基础是什么。那个C-SPAN的视频（指主楼的那个视频）确实是从美军的角度，但是请记住他为了促进自己的研究，正面对着一众军事专家进行演讲。
现在回答ABC78提出的关于这个有趣话题的问题，而不要试图打压别人。
#5 montyp165
The traditional Chinese warrior ethos has basically been that of the intellectual soldier/warrior, i.e, one who uses intelligence and cunning moreso than brute force to achieve goals. In fiction the Romance of the Three Kingdoms has numerous examples of this sort listed, or the Water Margin for that matter, and a modern (albeit from a Japanese novel) example would be Yang Wen-Li from Legend of the Galactic Heroes. Real life traditional warrior heroes would be people like Yue Fei or Qi Jiguang.
传统的中国尚武精神基本上是智将的特质。所谓智将，就是那些运用谋略和诡计而非武力来达到目的的人。在三国演义和水浒传里就有许多这样的例子。银河英雄传说中的杨威利是一个现代的例子（尽管是来自日本小说）。而真实存在的军事英雄就是像岳飞或者戚继光那样的人物。
The traditional Chinese warrior ethos has basically been that of the intellectual soldier/warrior, i.e, one who uses intelligence and cunning moreso than brute force to achieve goals. In fiction the Romance of the Three Kingdoms has numerous examples of this sort listed, or the Water Margin for that matter, and a modern (albeit from a Japanese novel) example would be Yang Wen-Li from Legend of the Galactic Heroes. Real life traditional warrior heroes would be people like Yue Fei or Qi Jiguang.
传统的中国尚武精神基本上是智将的特质。所谓智将，就是那些运用谋略和诡计而非武力来达到目的的人。在三国演义和水浒传里就有许多这样的例子。银河英雄传说中的杨威利是一个现代的例子（尽管是来自日本小说）。而真实存在的军事英雄就是像岳飞或者戚继光那样的人物。
9楼2013-03-09 08:55收起回复
不过我蛮有兴趣滴，女生也有喜欢这个的？
扫二维码下载贴吧客户端
下载贴吧APP
看高清直播、视频！
看高清直播、视频！
贴吧热议榜
- 1TES难逃陀螺魔咒遭HLE暴打2620410
- 2315打假打到考研圈2114390
- 3315曝光家电维修收费乱象1911252
- 4抗抗分析TES连跪内幕1350081
- 52025省考结束大家感受如何1001182
- 6800块钱让我对男朋友彻底下头862150
- 7KC拒绝被翻盘战胜CFO进决赛832488
- 8李嘉诚卖港口给美国被官方点名681835
- 9LPL耻辱外战哪个输得最惨488488
- 10具俊晔抱大S骨灰痛哭395787
