Formation
Napoli play a highly offensive formation – 3-4-2-1 with wing-backs focusing on attack and covering the whole flank; a pair of holding midfielders with different functions and often positioned vertically (Michele Pazienza acts like the “sweeper” of the midfield); a set of high fluid forwards (two wingers , who may swap flanks; and one striker).
Defensive actions
1. Mechanism of pressing
Napoli are prone to make defensive transitions higher up the field – trying to get the ball back as soon as it is lost in attack.
The main role when pressing is granted to Walter Gargano. He is positioned at the back of the attack and, as the ball is lost, he moves forward to take part in winning back the ball together with the near attacking players.
In case the opponent overcomes the pressing, the main function of breaking or slowing down the rival’s attack is granted to Pazienza – he prefers to start tackling after the centre circle, accompanying the opponent and waiting for Gargano to get back.


3. Gaps in defensive line:
a)    The open space on the flank behind the line of defenders – playing long balls quickly is dangerous for the team.
b)    Wing-backs close down the opposition’s wide midfielders, but as a result the full-backs of the rival usually have space and time as the wingers don’t usually track back, especially Ezequiel Lavezzi on the left flank.
Finally, a little observation in addition: it’s worth mentioning that Edinson Cavani sometimes drops deep to the zone of the ball which helps the defensive forces of the team when the opposition are in possession.


Offensive actions
1. Core offensive actions.
In attack, the team focuses on fast transition to attack using preferably long or medium diagonal or direct passes.
Target zones for the ball delivering are zones of wing-backs, near the corner of the box.
The key movement to create this space on the flanks is:
1.The wingers moving centrally, narrowing the opposition’s defense (the full-back of the opposition’s team is by the winger) and then build the strong “fist” in the core zone of the defense – in the box.
2.The wing-backs move quickly high up the field as the team win possession of the ball – they try to be positioned higher than the opponent’s wingers – and provide width in attack.
3.Gargano moves forward to bind the opponent’s holding midfielder and provide support to attacking players of the team – additional angle of pass.

Fig. 3 - Main movement and pass direction for core offensive actions
The central defenders and Gargano decide the direction of the attack as most of the passes to the attack are done by them. The centre-backs usually dribble to the centre circle then make the pass, while Pazienza drops back to cover the free zone of the advancing centre back. Preferably the passes are directed to left flank.
The main threat in the final stage of offensive action are crosses into the box from the wing-backs, usually directed to the centre of the box where Cavani runs, while the wingers run to their corresponding posts if possible.
The alternative option – if the zones are closed on the flank - is the winger moving to the flank as the respective wing-back get the ball. In most cases it leads to overmanning on the flank and interaction in coalition (winger, wing-back and Gargano) to get the ball into the box.


2. Alternative options in offensive transition. In case of the opponent press the centre backs of Napoli, making it difficult for them to run to the centre of the field or pass the ball to the holding midfielders, the wingers drift deep to get the ball, Lavezzi usually runs to the flank while Hamsik moves more centrally.
fig. 4 - Alternative options in offensive formation.
Due to different playing behavior of the wingers:
Lavezzi often dribbles from the flank to the centre; in this case Cavani may run down the field and create the space for Lavezzi in front.
Hamsik focuses more on giving passes. There are two possible options: to provide the ball to wing-back who overlap into the free zone (if the movement of Hamsik draws the full-back out of the position) or through Gargano.

fig. 4 - Alternative options in offensive formation.

3.    Long balls to Lavezzi as type of counter attack.
Lavezzi often doesn’t take part in defensive actions; he takes the position on the flank in the opponent’s part of the field. Napoli counter-attack by passing the ball to him in order to use his pace and dribbling ability. It’s can often be seen when the goalkeeper brings the ball back into the game quickly.
（完）



这篇文章把那玻璃滴体现中重要人物尼尼，哈姆，辣味奇，加加诺都扯到了.
尼尼踢滴木有巴勒莫时期累了，活动范围要小，哈姆滴位置前移，pass.也充分利用了辣味奇滴优点pace and dribbling ability.
8过那那滴问题好像在于中路木有10号球员，所以木有前插得分以及直传前锋滴传球，创造力神马滴.中路渗透滴进攻不是那那擅长滴.
铁桶阵对付那那看来果然好使，中路进攻手段MS不丰富，加加诺，帕琴扎也8素进攻能力突出滴box-to-box型，也木有出色滴正面远射得分.


加斯佩里尼的热那亚是那不勒斯的大克星，他离开后热那亚变阵，再打那不勒斯就没啥优势了
他的3-4-3和那不勒斯的3-4-2-1不完全一样，但有些相似的地方，估计这种打法在对应的位置比较能遏制住拿波里，中路你有两个屏障，我也有，你的边路对应我的边路没有任何优势。。。
以上我瞎猜的


像给不了解我那的菠菜粉分析
看久了3421两翼齐飞 对那那招数也就知道 是这几套了

回复：11楼

回复：12楼

其实能坚持看那那一个赛季比赛滴人还真8多


昨天对拉齐奥，我熬夜看完了录像，拉齐奥应该算比较典型的铁桶阵，catenaccio战术的忠实执行者，那不勒斯在0-1落后之后，运动战进攻还真是办法不多，基本就是各种边路传中,扳平那两球靠的都是定位球，我个人觉得最后能逆转跟球员的顽强意志和主场球迷的各种鼓舞关系很大，但运动战时面对乌龟阵真是破门乏力。
本赛季博洛尼亚3-1拉齐奥那场比赛，当时拉齐奥也是先进球后龟缩防守，但博洛尼亚的地面进攻居然行云流水，让拉齐奥招架不住的感觉，最后运动战进球扳平以至反超，中间拉齐奥也不是没有反击机会，但维维作出关键扑救。虽然整体实力不如那不勒斯，但单论运动战进攻的套路，博洛尼亚打得好的比赛那真是相当丰富的，短传、长传、配合、突破、中路直塞、边路传中等等等，而且比较节奏还挺快，可惜博洛尼亚抽风时和踢得好时完全就不是一个队。。。


来自Jonathan Wilson卫报滴专栏

意大利滴球队普遍都不去充分利用球场宽度，阵型拥挤在中路.
A 4-3-1-2 will always have problems with dealing with a 4-2-3-1, most notably in the full-back areas – the 4-3-1-2 finds its full-backs pinned back, the 4-2-3-1 can allow theirs to get forward and become additional midfielders. The benefit the 4-3-1-2 has is an extra midfielder and the benefit of two strikers, but the lack of natural width from midfield only emphasises the problem at full-back.
The key was not so much what the sides did with the ball, but what they did without it. Real pressed well, Milan focused on keeping their shape, and Real simply used width to pass around them. They also had Ronaldo, who was the best attacking player on the pitch by a long way.
来自米兰0：2皇马那场比赛